GSI Mock Draft: Round 5

by Jim Humbert 2/12/2008 8:09:00 PM

The draft is cruising right along and the fifth round is all wrapped up. Picks were varied in the round with seven hitters and five pitchers. The list of pitchers includes the first reliever taken in the draft. Take a look and let us know what you think.

 ROUND 1 | ROUND 2 | ROUND 3 | ROUND 4

49) CLASGENS - Nick Markakis, OF, BAL

50) SIMONS - Brian Roberts, 2B, BAL

51) MURDICO - Garret Atkins, 3B, COL

52) HUMBERT #1 - Justin Verlander, SP, DET

53) FISCHER - Ian Kinsler, 2B, TEX

54) MUEHLENKAMP - Cole Hamels, SP, PHI

55) DINSMORE - Scott Kazmir, SP, TB

56) BARTEL - Eric Byrnes, OF, ARI

57) BOLTON - Carlos Guillen, SS, DET

58) WETZEL - John Smoltz, SP, ATL

59) POLKING - Travis Hafner, 1B, CLE

60) HUMBERT #2 - Jonathan Papelbon, RP, BOS

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Fantasy Baseball

Related posts

Comments

2/12/2008 8:38:24 PM

Jim Humbert

Humbert Team #1 needed a pitcher and Verlander should be solid. He's entering that magical 'third' year as a starter, but has already proven himself. With the offense of the Tigers, 20 wins is not a stretch and if that happens he'll compete for the AL CY Young Award.

Humbert Team #2 grabbed the first reliever in the draft. It is very doubtful that Papelbon will last to the end of the fifth round in most drafts this spring. MLB.com has nine relievers ranked in their top 60 and many other sites will do the same. But the smart owner knows that a lot of saves can not only be picked up late in the draft, but also off of the waiver wire once the season progresses.

With that said, there is nothing wrong with taking a solid closer late in the fifth round. Don't be surprised if the pick starts a small run. Papelbon really is not much better than the next three or four guys on the reliever list.

Jim Humbert us

2/12/2008 11:00:11 PM

Dan Clasgens

I went with Nick Markakis. He followed up a great second half in '06 with a stellar sophomore campaign in '07 and at 24 he is on his way up. I'm not banking on the 18 bags again this year after he stole just two bases as a rookie, but he will help in every other catagory and could end up as a top five outfielder when it is also said and done.

Jim Humbert #2 took Pabelpon and its about time, but that only tells me that Jim Humbert #1 will be the last team to draft a closer. This is going to give Jim his perfect way to stake his "you don't need to draft closers early ever theory".

Muhlenkamp wound up with Hamels and he will not be disappointed, but my favorite pick of the round outside of my own of course (being that I had the round's first pick) was Murdico snagging up Garrett Atkins. He's the last of the two tier third basemen and the dropoff is noticable. Atkins provides nice power numbers and is a much safer bet than a Ryan Zimmerman or Edwin Encarnacion. Third base has talent, but the position is surprisingly thin in a 12-man league.

Dan Clasgens us

2/13/2008 8:29:18 AM

Jeremy Fischer

I was actually thrilled to get Kinsler in this Round. Considering 2B might be the thinnest of all positions, I figured someone would snag him earlier.

By all projections I have been monitoring, it looks like he should be a 20/20 man. You can't pass on that type of production, at the weakest position in fantasy, late in the middle rounds. MLB.com even has him projected as the 3rd best 2B. I don't know about that, but I do know I'll take 20/20 out of him regardless.

I also have no problem with Papelbon. In fact, had Kinsler not fallen into my lap here, I was ready to go with Paps.

I'm in the boat that says you never pay for saves (whether that means actually paying via an auction draft or paying via drafting one in the high rounds). However, I think in the middle rounds, it's okay to get one of the top closers, because they should be available, to anchor your saves category. Then you can pick up other save guys in the last rounds of the draft, or off the waiver wire to fill-in.

And I have made the first error in judgement. I agree with Dan: 3B is surprisingly shallow this year. I overestimated that and now I'm staring at no 3B, and none of the guys left on the board excite me.

But now I know.

Jeremy Fischer us

2/13/2008 12:12:14 PM

Chris Murdico

I was debating on going with another starter here in the fifth round or filling in spots in my lineup. I chose to forego the starter since there are still plenty of good ones out there and because I have a top tier starter already in Beckett.

Instead I decided to fill my 3B spot. Like Clasgens said, 3B is not a very deep position this year. Atkins was available so I snagged him up. He was definitely the best available and with him I have added onto a lineup that will put up some great power numbers along with filling the speed categories in runs and SBs, even if only slightly in the SB category.

I like the Papelbon pick here. He and Putz were the two I was looking to get if they fell to me in the next round. Since Papelbon is out and Putz most likely will be as well, I'll have to try to decide if I want to go starter or outfield, or maybe even 2B depending on how is available.

Other than my own pick, I liked Clasgens pick of Markakis. He's a star in the making and could have another great year.

Oh, and J-Fish, now you know...and knowing is half the battle!

Chris Murdico us

2/13/2008 5:05:50 PM

Jimmy Dinsmore

I posted earlier that 2B is not nearly as shallow as you think. That's a misnomer. Third base is very, very shallow and honestly first base (as far as really solid guys) is shallower than in year's past (thanks to steady guys being less steady and other stars aging). I was glad to see the reliever run start, but I won't be participating in that run. I can't believe nobody is praising the Kazmir pick I made. I liked Hammels and would've snagged him, but Kazmir did lead the majors in KOs which is one of the categories. Yes, he won't get the wins of an ace, but honestly you can throw a no hitter and not get a win either, so wins is the one crapshoot category. Kazmir isn't top 5, but he's certainly a high second tier guy and I was thrilled to snag him.

Jimmy Dinsmore us

2/13/2008 5:22:50 PM

Jim Humbert

I saw no reason to praise Kazmir. He was picked at the right spot. The next three pitchers chosen were Smoltz, Harang and Zambrano. And wins do matter. If Kazmir were on a better team or even a different division, he could win 18 instead of 13. That would move him up a few notches.

It is one of the fantasy debates - do you prefer a good pitcher on a bad team or a mediocre pitcher on a good team?


Jim Humbert us

2/13/2008 9:58:43 PM

Adam Bartel

My feeling is that you need to get the most talented pitcher, and let the wins work themselves out. There's usually a few teams that surprise on both ends, so oftentimes your assumptions don't work out there. Plus, if a guy doesn't get run support through mere chance, the team he's on doesn't matter all that much. If you have enough talent, the K's/ERA/WHIP will override any win deficiencies you might have.

Adam Bartel us

2/13/2008 10:57:21 PM

Jimmy Dinsmore

yes, and if Johan Santana were a D-Ray (or just Ray now) would he not still be the best pitcher. Smoltz, I love the guy, but he's old and his previous injury history scares me. Zambrano is inconsistent (remember him through June, I do I had him last year and it was a nightmare). Harang, okay I didn't draft him because I had two Reds already and I didn't want to hear the homer chants. But Harang is a solid pitcher and is a fantasy ace, in my opinion.

I don't now or ever draft for wins. You never know. A great pitcher can have wins blown for him all the time. It's not his fault and it doesn't hurt his value, in my opinion. Kazmir has 20-game winner stuff, that's what I draft for. By the way, how stupid were the Mets to give up Kazmir. I think they got Victor Zambrano and somebody else for him. Doh!

Jimmy Dinsmore

2/14/2008 10:32:02 PM

Pete Muehlenkamp

A quick comparison of Cole Hamels and a few similar pitchers who will go close to him in most drafts:

The following stats listed in order are: Innings/ H9/ BB9/ K9 / HR9/ ERA/ and WHIP.
Hamels 183.3 / 7.95 / 2.11 / 8.69 / 1.23 / 3.39 / 1.12
Bedard 182 / 6.97 / 2.82 / 10.93 / 0.94 / 3.16 / 1.09
Harang 231.6 / 8.27/ 2.02/ 8.47/ 1.09 / 3.73 / 1.14
Verlander 201.6/ 8.08/ 2.99/ 8.17/ 0.89/ 3.66/ 1.23
Kazmir 206.6 / 8.54 / 3.88 / 10.41/ 0.78/ 3.48/ 1.38

Some quick observations:
- Bedard had the best year of the bunch and now moves to a pitchers' park- he is the first that should be picked.
- Kazmir's WHIP and anemic team (though the Rays are getting better) make him the last to be picked of the five.
- Of the other three, Harang plays on the weaker team and pitches in a bandbox. Its amazing that he put up those numbers with such obstacles last year. He is underrated and probably could be had later in most drafts outside of Cincinnati.
- Verlander's control problems drop him a tick below Hamels whose major flaw is not his fault- pitching in a hitters' park third only to Cincinnati and Colorado...Hamels is the second choice of this group.
- By the way, Fausto Carmona does NOT belong in this tier because of his low strikeout rate.

Pete Muehlenkamp us

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

7/5/2008 7:02:47 AM

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.3.0.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the author

Name of author Author name
Something about me and what I do.

E-mail me Send mail

Calendar

<<  July 2008  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

View posts in large calendar

Pages

Recent posts

Recent comments

Tags

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008

Sign in