Crumpler could fill void for Bengals

by Dan Clasgens 2/17/2008 8:29:00 PM

The great tight end debate has existed with the Bengals for years, do they need a tight end? Marvin Lewis insists the team's system does not demand the need for a receiving tight end. Instead, the team's offense excels on solid blocking from the position. Reggie Kelly has provided great value to the team. His role often goes unnoticed and unappreciated by the casual fan.

I am on the side of the argument that believes that while Kelly (and a player of his type) is critical for the system's execution, the time to evolve the offense a bit has come. Some of the league's top offenses rely greatly on the play of a tight end as a receiver. It keeps the defense from doubling wide every time. Look at what the likes of Jason Witten, Kellen Winslow, Dallas Clark, and Antonio Gates have had on their teams' success.

The Bengals haven't had a receiving tight end that drew the opposing secondary's attention since Tony McGee and haven't had a player excel in that role significantly since Rodney Holman in the late 1980's. The team could look to address the need in the draft, but this year's crop of tight ends appears thin and there are greater needs to address in the portion of the draft where you could find a legitimate threat.

Conversley, free agency seems an easier route to go. Alge Crumpler, who like Kelly a few years before him, was released by the Atlanta Falcons last week as the team begins to go through rebuild mode. The thirty-year old is clearly on the downside of his career and coming off an injury-riddled 2007 campaign. With questions surrounding his conditioning and health, he will come cheap.

Crumpler finished the season with 42 catches for 444 yards and five touchdowns, but he averaged 56 receptions for 810 ReYd per season and 19 total touchdowns in three previous seasons. You have to take in to account the weapons around him. If healthy, Crumpler would pose big problems for teams that are trying to contend with Chad Johnson, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and Chris Henry. The Panthers have already expressed interest and there will likely be other teams that take a look, I just hope one of them is the Bengals.

Currently rated 4.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

NFL

Related posts

Comments

2/17/2008 10:15:03 PM

Adam Hammer

Crumpler suffered because his QB was in shackles. Having him on the field could divert coverage from TJ and Chad.

Adam Hammer us

2/18/2008 11:42:22 AM

Jimmy Dinsmore

I agree with your premise Dan. The Bengals need a pass receiving TE to compliment Reggie Kelly, superior blocking TE. But, Crumpler is not the answer. His numbers have been tailing off. Even this year aside (when he had no QB essentially), his numbers were starting to slide. He's 30 years old and has a gimpy knee. To me, that's not a wise investment for this team. To me, his best years are behind him. We can find a receiving TE in the draft. Our free agent dollars need to be spent wisely and spent on defense. Why not go hard after Haynesworth. That guy could anchor the D-line, then focus hard on DE and LBs. I realize Haynesworth isn't a boy scout, but dude is a stud.

Jimmy Dinsmore us

2/18/2008 12:47:59 PM

Jeremy Fischer

I am in Jimmy's camp on this one. Crump is not worth spending the money on.

Main reason: Check out the Bengals track record with guys, whether acquired through draft, trade, or FA, who have "injury histories" and we just hope that they are healthy.

Don't waste money on that theory anymore. Spend it better.

Jeremy Fischer us

2/18/2008 1:24:04 PM

Dan Clasgens

Jimmy where are you looking at stats because you are way off on your assessment?

Aside from a Michael Vick-less and injury-riddled '07, Crumpler is getting better with age. He followed up a career-high in receptions and yards in '05 with a career-best 8 touchdowns in '06.

Secondly, even if his 2007 season numbers were down, the Bengals haven't had one season where every tight end on their team had more than Crumpler's five scores since '97. In fact, the eight trips to the end zone that Crumpler made in '06 is more than the Bengals as team has accomplished in any of the past 18 seasons, a span in which they've produced one winning season and one playoff appearance.

It's time for you guys and the team to admit the need for change is here.

As for the money, every indication I have is that Crumpler will sign for less than he made last season (set to make $5.1 million before gettting cut). Somewhere in the ballpark of $3.5 - $4.5 million per year will get it done.

Dan Clasgens us

2/18/2008 9:16:19 PM

Adam Bartel

I've always been a big fan of the blocking tight end over the receiving ones, but looking into the numbers I think I'm wrong. The last ten Super Bowl champions averaged 58 receptions and 644 yards receiving from the tight end position; that's almost double what Reggie Kelly and Dan Coats provided last season. I'm sure Carson wouldn't mind getting a middle of the field option like Crumpler.

Adam Bartel us

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

12/4/2008 3:43:02 PM

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.3.0.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the author

Name of author Author name
Something about me and what I do.

E-mail me Send mail

Calendar

<<  December 2008  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

View posts in large calendar

Recent posts

Recent comments

Tags

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008

Sign in